The Pejoritive “Racist” Is Intentionally Being Misused

Standard

I dislike hip-hop music, hearing the English Language mangled, abused and cheapened by hip-hop artists is painful. Artists?  If artist is defined as someone who can create something ugly, yes than I guess they are artists. (Personal preferences are still legal!)

These few outspoken and honest personal preferences will, I’m sure, quickly get me labeled as a racist — but only by people who are too illiterate to understand the definition of racist, just as these same illiterate people quickly branded Donald Trump as a racist because he called Justice Gonzalo Curiel a Mexican and insinuated that, because of his Mexican heritage he will not adjudicate the Trump University lawsuit fairly.

I’m not saying that Donald Trump does not have Foot-In-Mouth disease; he does! What I’m saying is, it is ignorant to brand someone a racist for a single comment that has nothing to do with race and everything to do with ethnicity and politics. (Go HERE to be reminded of the difference between ethnicity and race.)

A “racist” in particular is defined as a person who believes that one race should control all others or that a particular race is inferior to his or her own (Merriam-Webster).

Obviously “racist” does not apply to Donald Trump and, as obvious, is the fact that individuals and media figures who use this pejorative about Donald Trump are creating their own definitions for their own benefit.

It’s obvious that Trump, before the foot went in the mouth, should have not only mentioned but highlighted Judge Curiel’s membership in the “California La Raza Lawyers Association” and this Associations ties to the National Council de La Raza (the Council of “The Race”). LaRaza is infamous for its opposition to existing immigration laws and gets absolutely rabid at the mention of a wall on the Mexican border; a wall like the one Donald Trump has promised to build, to stop the constant influx of illegal immigrants into the United States. LaRaza is also a supporter of sanctuary cities (Trump is an opponent of the sanctuary city model), where illegal aliens are protected from immigration laws.

Yes, the United States is a country that was, at least in a sense, “built” by immigrants, but the vast majority of them were here in the United States legally and later became citizens. Now, however, there are so many immigrants here illegally that there is no way to account for them and increasingly no way to continue paying for their education, housing, health care, etc. without great sacrifices on the part of American citizens and on the part of those immigrants who are here legally.legally. Now, however, there are so many immigrants here illegally that there is no way to account for them and increasingly no way to continue paying for their education, housing, health care, etc. without great sacrifices on the part of American citizens and on the part of those immigrants who are here legally.legally and later became citizens. Now, however, there are so many immigrants here illegally that there is no way to account for them and increasingly no way to continue paying for their education, housing, health care, etc. without great sacrifices on the part of American citizens and on the part of those immigrants who are here legally.

The obvious problem then is not any good or evil Trump University might have fostered, the problem is a judge who is very likely to rule against Trump University, not based on the facts but based on the Trump University founder’s political stances.

Advertisements