Connecticut Sex Abuse Statute of Limitations


Statute of Limitations

A bill currently working it’s way through the Connecticut Legislature would remove the statute of limitations on child sex abuse cases. On the surface that sounds like a reasonable thing to do; until, that is, you consider the very possible effect of that legislation if it is passed.

Currently, under Connecticut law, a person who had suffered sexual abuse at the hands of an adult can file a lawsuit against the person or institution responsible for that abuse until his/her 48th birthday. If the current limitation of “30 years past the person’s 18th birthday” is removed, anyone at any age can claim he/she was abused at any time in the past and file a lawsuit asking for compensation.

The quandary is, as this CNN Justice article points out: Connecticut bishops fight sex abuse bill: “the bill would allow claims that are 70 years or older, in which key individuals are deceased, memories have been faded, and documents and other evidence have been lost.”

Even now, with the current Statute of Limitations, the situation is a virtual Disneyland for trial lawyers who will press for “a settlement”, even in cases where there is little or no evidence — and organizations and institutions, even if they are totally innocent of the charges, will most often pay those settlements rather than spend years in court and millions in lawyers fees defending themselves. If the Statute of Limitations was lifted, the number of law suits would no doubt multiply; and most of the new law suits would probably be filed by people who have no legitimate claim to compensation, people who just want to take advantage of an unfortunate situation.

Over the past weekend, the Connecticut Catholic Bishops posted a letter on their website and distributed it to every Catholic Church in the state. The letter makes their case that “The legislation would undermine the mission of the Catholic Church in Connecticut, threatening our parishes, our schools, and our Catholic Charities.” All Connecticut Catholics are being urged to contact their representatives and oppose this bill (H.B. 5473).

The Catholic church has, of course, the most to loose because they have made themselves the biggest target in the child-sex abuse arena by their inability to keep their house in order; but they are correct on this one.

In my opinion even that “30 years past the age of 18” is, at least in the majority of cases, far too permissive. At some point after any incident, reality tends to get skewed and many false memories and mental exaggerations will take the place of accurate memory. A 2007 Science Daily report suggests that while “children’s memory of long-ago events may be more accurate than previously thought” there is also a risk that “children’s memories have been contaminated by false information.” As years are added to the process, it will be even more unlikely that original memories are untainted.


CNN Justice: Connecticut bishops fight sex abuse bill

Connecticut Catholic Conference: Connecticut Bishop’s Statement on H.B. 5473

Science Daily: Children’s Memory Of Long-Ago Events May Be More Accurate Than Previously Thought


3 thoughts on “Connecticut Sex Abuse Statute of Limitations

  1. Paul

    A similar bill was introduced and was defeated in Colorado. Colorado lawmakers decided to drop the section of a bill that would have extended the statute of limitations for both public and private institutions. The decision came following resistance – of all places – from the public schools’ insurance agents after they found out their clients – the school systems – could be sued.

    What does that say about the level of abuse in public schools and how concerned lawmakers actually were for abused children? If the legislation couldn’t specifically and solely target the Catholic Church then there was no interest in pursuing the “cause of the children” through legislation. The double standard should make every American and every voter in CT sick to their stomachs.

    The effort back-fired on the sponsor of the bill in Colorado after lawmakers lumped ALL institutions into the bill. Make this bill to apply to all children and all institutions and the lawmakers will drop it like a hot rock.

    If the intent of legislation is to protect the children, shouldn’t it protect ALL the children in the state? Seems fair to me.

  2. Paul,

    Thanks for writing and commenting.

    You’re absolutely right — a law like that needs to protect all the kids in all settings.

    I didn’t know about the Colorado law — that’s good info — thanks!


  3. john

    I was abused my my probation officer when i was 14 years old. (I am now 43) I remember it like it was yesterday. I was 30 years old when in all came out. I was among at least 15 victims and the probation officer was sentenced to 15 years. Since it all came to light in 1998 it has been an uphill struggle to get justice for us do to the statue of limitations. Though I understand that there are more than a few people that would take advantage of a lifting of the statue of limitations the statue continues to victimize those of us who have legitimate claims. I say let the evidence speak on a case by case basis. It is more likely than not that a predator has more than a few victims. and this should be factored in to each and every case.
    I believe at the vary least that the statue of limitations against filing a suit against the State of CT should be lifted.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s